Uncategorized

Cycling’s Dark Era Part 2 2000-2005

Let me start part 2 of this blog entry by setting the scene from the previous few years of cycling. After the nightmare 1998 Tour de France, everyone involved was thrilled to have a relatively controversy free 1999 Tour de France whereby the public were very happy to support cancer survivor and fundraiser Lance Armstrong as he completed a fairy tale comeback to win the Tour.

What the public didn’t know however was that Armstrong was using suspicious doctor Dr Michele Ferrari to support him with an organised doping programme, which included Armstrong’s gardener following the Tour throughout the three weeks on his red motorbike, ready to deliver banned performance enhancing substances such as EPO to Lance and several other team mates. Whilst the public saw and the organisers pushed forward the ideal of a new clean, era of professional cycling started by Lance Armstrong, the truth was that cycling was entering it’s worst ever period of doping.

The new millennium was the completion of a transition within doping, as gone were the days of the teams running professional doping programmes for their riders, who were forced to sort out their doping themselves now as the teams wanted no part of it after the Festina affair in 1998. 2000 also saw the UCI finally make a step forward to curb the rampant doping, with a new test being developed to detect EPO. The test was initially put in place for the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, although it was then used in the 2000 Tour de France.

Armstrong’s doctor Dr Michele Ferrari was always kept up to date with the latest tests being developed to curb doping, therefore with the advent of a new EPO test Lance and his United States Postal Service team shied away from using EPO during the Tour, instead choosing to use a more old fashioned and natural performance enhancer: blood transfusions.

Whilst this wasn’t a new technology, taking out a blood bag several weeks before the Tour and then infusing it back in during a crucial part of the Tour would provide a natural boost in red blood cells which was also very hard to detect. With this innovation in cycling Armstrong and several team mates followed this process in the weeks leading up to the Tour. Armstrong’s team mate Tyler Hamilton speaks of this in his brilliant book The Secret Race where he states after winning a key warm up race for the Tour the Criterium Dauphine Libere only days before doing the transfusion, and struggling to ride up a small hill in the aftermath of taking out a blood bag.

The 2000 Tour de France was once again free of major doping scandal as Lance Armstrong successfully defended his 1999 Tour de France triumph over Jan Ullrich and Joseba Beloki. The sport appeared to be cleaning itself up after two relatively quiet years in terms of riders being busted for doping, although this would all change with the advent of the new EPO test.


Armstrong in action during the 2000 Tour de France.

Thanks to http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-24/lance-armstrong-rides-in-the-2000-tour-de-france/4221010 for the image.

2001 saw several riders test positive for EPO, with the first ever being prominent Danish rider Bo Hamburger, although he would later be acquitted after irregularities with his B sample. The 2001 Giro D’Italia would also be marred with doping scandals. Leading contender Dario Frigo would be expelled from the race after police found banned substances when searching several teams hotels. Police uncovered a significant amount of doping products as they searched riders from all 20 teams, leading to several riders being thrown out of the race.

This would prove to be the only major doping incidents during the 2001 season, as Armstrong raced to a third successive Tour de France title. 2002 would be more of the same as both previous winners of the Giro D’Italia Stefano Garzelli and Gilberto Simoni would test positive for drugs and face suspensions. 2002 also provided a perfect snapshot of the lack of concern around rampant doping in cycling as the UCI failed to strip 3rd place rider Raimondas Rumsas of his podium position in the Tour de France despite his wife being found with vast quantities of performance enhancing drugs including EPO and growth hormone. His wife explained the drugs were for her mother in law. Rumsas would later be banned for one year in 2003 after testing positive for EPO during that years Giro D’Italia.


Raimondas Rumsas on the podium at the end of the 2002 Tour de France on the far right in 3rd place overall.

Thanks to L’Equipe for the photo http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur-route/Diaporama/Un-palmares-a-recreer/254

2003 would look from the outside like any other year with a number of riders being banned for doping, although it would have much wider implications as Jesus Manzano retired from cycling and turned whistle blower with the Spanish Guardia Civil, who’s investigation became known as Operacion Puerto. After becoming disillusioned with cycling he was fired by his Kelme team, Manzano turned whistle blower to the doping practices of the team, which included blood transfusions and various injections of performance enhancing drugs, in co-operation with Spanish doctor Dr Eufemiano Fuentes.

The team doctor for the Kelme team would later become synonymous with doping, much like fellow former cycling team doctor Dr Michele Ferrari. For now all the allegations were strenously denied, although these allegations refused to go away. 2004 was another bad year for doping with two well known riders being suspended. Firstly the Brit and former yellow jersey holder in previous Tour de France races David Millar was suspended for two years after police searched his house and found doping products. Millar admitted to using EPO three times in previous years and was banned until 2006.

American and former Tour de France contender Tyler Hamilton was also suspended for two years after testing positive for a blood transfusion both after winning the gold medal in the 2004 Olympics men’s individual time trial and during the 2004 Vuelta a Espana. After initially denying his positive tests, once his front line career was over once he returned to cycling he admitted to using performance enhancing drugs in his brilliantly honest book The Secret Race.

Tyler Hamilton on the podium celebrating his 2004 Olympic gold medal. This would later be stripped from him after testing positive for a blood transfusion twice in the ensuing moths. Photo credit goes to Greg Wood of  AFP/Getty Images. Sourced from http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/08/10/tyler-hamilton-officially-stripped-of-2004-olympic-gold-medal-in-cycling/

2005 was another run of the mill year with several riders being eliminated from the Tour de France for doping, whilst Vuelta a Espana specialist Roberto Heras was stripped of his win in the 2005 Vuelta after testing positive for EPO that year on stage 20. He was stripped of his record breaking fourth win in the Vuelta a Espana, before being reinstated in 2012 after procedural errors with the testing.

As the Lance Armstrong era came to a close in 2005, the world of cycling was still being barraged with doping scandals which seriously undermined the heroics presented to the fans and TV audiences by the riders. Whilst the UCI hoped to ride out the storm, little did anyone know the fuse on another major doping scandal was about to blow up in their faces. Please stay tuned for part 3 coming up soon.

Cycling’s dark era

Professional cycling and performance enhancing drugs. For almost two decades these went hand in hand as the sport was ravaged by a wild west era of professional doping programmes, in which the sport lost almost all it’s credibility and those who cheated prospered whilst those who chose to remain clean rotted on the outer reaches of success in the sport they loved.

Doping has always been a problem in professional cycling, as athletes faced with three weeks of immense physical pain have always looked for ways to numb or dull the pain. In the early days cyclists would use alcohol to numb the pain, however from the 1950’s onwards recreational drugs such as amphetamines become the latest technology in doping. Amphetamines were common place during the peloton for the next 30 years, although whilst they would give riders extra energy they would also alter their thinking and often led to ridiculous breaks which were never successful.

During the 1980’s amphetamines were prevalent in the pro peloton, although not every one was using performance enhancing drugs. One of those include ex-pro rider Theo de Rooij, who states in an interview with http://www.theouterline.com his own experiences with amphetamines ” That stuff made me do crazy things; it made me feel strong, but I also realized that the stuff was very addictive, so I decided to stay away from it.” (ed: For more information on doping check out their amazing article series called Perspectives on doping!)

De Rooij in action during his pro career in the 1980’s.

The game changer in performance enhancing drugs was the development and abuse of EPO. This drug which boosted red blood cells in blood and designed for people with anaemia (low blood count), it was tailor made for endurance athletes such as professional cyclists. Pioneered by Italian riders during the early 1990’s it’s use quickly became widespread, with a sworn secrecy over it’s use leading to increasing doses as riders became paranoid of other riders using more doping products to enhance their performance and gain an advantage on the peloton.

During the 1990’s it truly was the wild west in terms of doping as huge quantities of EPO were used and abused to enhance performance. EPO was a game changer not only because of it’s ability to greatly enhance your own performance, but because it was impossible to be caught using it as throughout the 1990’s there was no test available to detect EPO. EPO quickly became the holy grail of doping as a large majority of professional team set up an organised doping programme using highly sophisticated and knowledgable doctors, alongisde high tech equipment to give them an edge over the rest.

At the time the UCI, cycling’s governing body, both seemed to have little resources and interest in properly investigating systematic doping in cycling. By the mid-1990’s the first obvious signs of doping distorting race results became clear, with examples being the “miracle” three man break from the Italian Gewiss-Ballan team, that simply powered away from everyone else on the final portion of the race to claim a 1-2-3 at Fleche Wallone in 1994. After the race team doctor Dr Michele Ferrari made his infamous quote about EPO “EPO is not dangerous, it’s the abuse that is. It’s also dangerous to drink 10 liters of orange juice.” It’s probably no coincidence that Dr Michele Ferrari later became synonymous with EPO and doping, as he was a major factor behind the dominance of Lance Armstrong and the United States Postal Service team as they won 7 straight Tour de France title between 1999 and 2005.

Youtube Footage of the infamous Stage 16 Hautacam climb made famous by Bjarne Riis in 1996.

Another example is the apparent ease with which Danish rider Bjarne Riis was able to tackle the infamous Hautacam climb in 1996. During the later stages of the 1996 Tour de France the riders approached the notoriously tricky Hautacam, known as one of the most challenging climbs in world cycling, yet TV footage showed Bjarne Riis riding it like a Sunday afternoon relaxing training ride. He repeatedly launched himself from the peloton before slowing and allowing the group to catch him again before repeating the process several times. Eventually Riis broke away for good and claimed the stage win comfortably, although his actions were peculiar to many cycling experts as his process of riding hautacam defied convention. 11 years later the public discovered his secret to victory that day as Riis announced he had used performance enhancing drugs including EPO during his career.

Bjarne Riis shows the pain of his 1996 Tour de France victory.
Sourced from https://leagueofbikes.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/bjarne-riis-hautacam-1996/3acdc4b4a3184a59956bbd432998c716_400/

By 1997 the UCI finally took action against rampant doping in cycling, by implementing a 50% limit for riders hematocrit, a.k.a the amount of red blood cells they have in their blood. Some counter however that infact the teams themselves came to the UCI pleading them to implement some measure as they deemed the riders doping to be getting out of control. Whoever implemented the measure it did have an affect in curbing doping slightly, as gone were the days of Bjarne Riis winning the Tour de France with a hematocrit of 60% and over.

Hematocrit is vital to cyclists and endurance athletes as the more red blood cells you have, the more oxygen you have being carried to the muscles. This means your less likely to fatigue or get lactic acid build up in your muscles. Therefore, if you can perform at your peak for longer than your rival it’s likely you’ll be able to beat them. For cyclists this became the holy grail in the 1990’s, with a normal persons hematocrit likely to be between 40-45%, however for cyclists before 1997 regular use of EPO and other performance enhancing drugs such as testosterone, Human Growth Hormone and Cortisone would boost their figures to between 55-65%.

The UCI implemented the 50% ruling as a “health measure”, therefore when riders were caught with a hematocrit over 50% they were simply suspended for two weeks before being reinstated. From here the status quo remained until July 1998. The Tour de France was eagerly anticipated like any other Tour, however in the days prior to the start in Ireland, a chain of events began which would lead to a complete change in the doping culture of professional cycling. The most successful team in the 1998 Tour de France was the Festina team. Packed with top line riders it was likely one of their riders would win the Tour de France. This would soon change however as team soigneur, effectively a team helper, Willy Voet was stopped by French customs in Belgium as he tried to enter France through a small border crossing by Lille.

A routine check of his Festina team car found an insane amount of doping products within, which included 234 capsules of EPO, 82 vials of Human Growth Hormone, 160 capsules of testosterone and various other doping products. After the team at first distanced themselves from Voet, it soon became clear everyone from the team would be questioned once they returned to France. Once it became clear French police had uncovered a systematic doping programme on the Festina team, directeur sportif Bruno Roussel and team doctor Eric Rijckaert were forced to end their denials and admit to a systematic doping programme on the team, which was later discovered to have been funded by the riders. From here all the key players from the Festina team were questioned by police, including star riders Alex Zulle, Richard Virenque and Laurent Dufaux.


Virenque clearly bewildered at the 1998 Tour de France.
Sourced from http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/virenque-hopes-french-senate-list-includes-festina-riders

The team would be subsequently thrown out of that year’s Tour de France and all riders apart from Virenque would admit to doping. From here French police searched other teams at the tour and found doping products at almost all the teams. In turn the riders protested about their harsh treatment by police and stage several protests during stages whereby the riders would deliberately ride slowly or even stop for several hours. In the end the incredible victory for the Italian Marco Pantani, who also won the Giro D’Italia that year also, was overshadowed by the ongoing Festina affair.

From here things settled down again, with the next major storm surrounding the Italian Marco Pantani. After winning two of cycling’s biggest races in the Giro D’Italia and Tour de France in 1998, Pantani looked for a repeat in 1999 as he dominated the Giro. Only days before the end however, he fell foul of the 50% limit of the UCI and was suspended for two weeks. Although this created many news headlines, the significance in the story was whether he had been set up and did center on doping like the Festina affair had.

http://blogs.as.com/.a/6a00d83451bf7069e201a5116e3fb0970c-450wi
Pantani being led away by police after his expulsion from the 1999 Giro D’Italia.
Sourced from an AS blog http://blogs.as.com/pedaladas/2014/02/las-ense%C3%B1anzas-del-pantani-valiente-y-del-pantani-oscuro.html

After the Public Relations disaster that was the 1998 Tour de France over, the UCI and Tour organisers were eager to renew the public’s faith in the race for 1999. They both promised a slower race to show they were curbing doping in cycling. Little did they know however that their biggest problem around doping were just about to begin as Lance Armstrong was coming back to the Tour and was determined to claim victory, whichever way possible. For more on this story please view my second part to this blog entry which will be posted in the next few days. Hope you enjoyed it!

Indycar rumour mill round-up

This week has already seen some interesting rumours develop relating to potential driver moves concerning the Indycar series. The American open wheel championship has become increasingly popular with drivers over the past few years, with plenty of European drivers now turning their back on the exorbitant costs needed to simply get close to Formula One, yet many of these racers spurn the well supported World Endurance Championship as they want to remain racing single seaters. This leaves the Indycar series as the only alternative prominent single seater championship outside of F1 or the junior categories such as GP2 or Formula Renault 3.5 series.

After Carlin announced earlier this week that they would be joining the rejuvenated Indy Lights series next year, with a view to moving up to the Indycar series in the future, this shows the increasingly appeal of Indycar to the European racing community. Firstly whilst it’s not a particularly new rumour it does seem Daniel Abt is looking to move away from GP2 for next year and join the Indycar grid for next year.

He tested for the Andretti Autosport team in late October at Barber Motorsports Park and Abt was quoted as saying about the test “I had a fantastic day with plenty of fun and learned a lot. I didn’t do this test out of boredom, but would like to explore options for next year. The test was a cool experience that definitely whets my appetite for more.” Whilst Abt has current commitments with the new Formula E series, it does appear Abt is keen to change his direction and leave GP2 for the Indycar series next year.

Another former GP2 rival could be joining him stateside, as the American Conor Daly has switched his attentions back to his homeland after running into budget problems during his second year of GP2 this year. Whilst this once again isn’t a revelation it does show how the series is attracting top line American talent not just European drivers for the series, and Daly would need less acclimatization as he finished the 2013 Indy 500 in 22nd position in a one-off deal for the iconic race.

Another top line American driver that is looking to join the Indycar grid in 2015 is Alex Rossi, formerly the Caterham and Marussia reserve driver seems to have given up on F1 after coming very close this year to making his race debut with the Marussia team. Rossi was set to make his debut at this years Belgian Grand Prix in place of Max Chilton, however Chilton was re-installed at the last minute. Rossi has now switched his attention to the Indycar series for next year. Rossi has spent the last few months talking with prospective teams, and hopes to announce a deal with a competitive team in the next few weeks and into the new year.

British racer and GP3 runner up Dean Stoneman is another driver looking to switch from Europe to the American open wheel racing scene, and hopes to secure himself a Indycar test this winter in preparation for a move stateside. Whilst Stoneman himself feels ready to join the Indycar series, he has also stated if needed to he will join the feeder Indy Lights series first to gain experience of the american road circuits and the ovals. Whilst nothing is concrete at the moment, it seems plenty of Indycar and Indy Lights teams will be interested in him joining them next year. Could a potential link up with British team Carlin work out for Stoneman next year?

The final and most exciting potential rumour surrounding the Indycar series recently has been the news former Scuderia Toro Rosso driver Jean Eric Vergne is very interested in joining the series, as his next move after being replaced in F1 for next year. The Frenchman has stated he very much is looking at the Indycar series and it seems likely he will have a string of offers to join the series next year. Whilst Vergne may take a season or two to learn the American ovals and road courses, once he gets comfortable Vergne would be a formidable competitor for anyone in the series. Nothing is planned at the moment in terms of tests or significant talks with teams, although it seems likely Vergne’s next stage of his career would be stateside.

Why Bernie Ecclestone seems so out of touch with modern F1

F1 is currently in a state of transition, as the demise of the Marussia and the struggles for the Caterham team after the Russian Grand prix have highlighted the severe financial problem that is currently afflicting Formula One. The lower funded teams such as Sahara Force-India, Lotus and Sauber are all campaigning for a reduction in costs, or an increase in their share of the money produced by F1.

The recent comments by Bernie Ecclestone suggest F1 will instead turn to extra customer cars provided by the bigger teams such as Red Bull, Ferrari, AMG Mercedes and McLaren and run by the likes of Sauber and Lotus. The other option is a super GP2 car where the feeder GP2 series cars are uprated and ran by the smaller teams instead. Other comments by Ecclestone on issues such as F1 and social media have led some to suggest that Ecclestone has lost touch with modern F1 and the needs of it’s changing audience.

The issue relating to the wealth distribution has become a critical issue within Formula One, with the likes of Sahara-Force India deputy team principal Bob Fernley threatening briefly that the team would boycott the recent United States Grand Prix as cost cutting and distribution of revenue talks both broke down. The current situation is precarious with Marussia already folding as a team, and Caterham announcing recently 230 of their staff were being made redundant as they struggle on this weekend in Abu Dhabi, after missing the last two Grand Prix’s. Even the more established teams such as Sahara-Force India are struggling to compete with the rest of the grid as they do not have the vast wealth of manufacter or sponsor funding behind them. Sauber are also seriously struggling and were forced to take the vast sponsor funding from drivers Marcus Ericsson and Felipe Nasr to continue racing in 2015.
Felipe Nasr in GP2 action this year, something he may have to use as reference points in F1 next year.

It seems that the bigger teams and Bernie Ecclestone have shown little empathy with those lower down the grid, with persistent talks of cost cutting being rejected as the teams are unable to come to an agreement to serious cost cutting in Formula One. Now it appears talks for a fairer distribution of the revenue generated from F1 shared between the teams appear to be stalling also as the midfield teams have demanded emergency talks with Ecclestone this weekend in Abu Dhabi. The smaller teams are aiming to thrash out a deal that would prevent the mooted two-tier system, whereby the current F1 regulations are retained whilst the smaller teams compete with a super GP2 concept based around an uprated GP2 race car.

The letter written by Sahara-Force India deputy team principal Bob Fernley is quoted as stating “From our meetings we noted positively that our concerns were acknowledged and there was a basis for a constructive dialogue, However, after our meeting in Brazil we clearly see the direction of Formula 1 towards customer cars/super GP2. It is equally clear that the strategy group has no intention at all to reduce cost. We would like to highlight that we came to you primarily with the request to reduce costs. Due to the lack of interest in pursuing this target we then addressed the distribution of income as a way to absorb the higher costs.”

It does appear there is some truth to these comments with Bernie Ecclestone admitting during the US GP weekend that he had got the distribution of wealth in F1 wrong. He stated when asked “The problem is there is too much money probably being distributed badly – probably my fault. But like lots of agreements people make, they seemed a good idea at the time. Why not just bypass team bosses and go to heads of board? I think it’s probably what will have to happen.” Ecclestone would also admit during that weekend that “We should tear all of the current contracts up, Tear them all up and start again.” Formula One appears to have been heading towards this crisis for a long time now, with the vast increase in budgets caused by the highly complicated and innovative turbo V6 power plants providing the spark that ignited this current financial problem within F1.

Bernie Ecclestone looking distressed.

Another cause for concern currently in F1 is the drop in worldwide TV audiences, with some calling now for F1 to embrace social media to appeal to a new generation of potential F1 fans. This is another knock on Ecclestone as quotes from a recent interview suggest Ecclestone has no interest in embracing social media and therefore promoting F1 to a broader, younger generation for the future. Ecclestone’s recent comments made to the Campaign Asia-Pacific magazine show is lack of interest in encouraging younger fans into F1.

Ecclestone commented when asked “I’m not interested in tweeting, Facebook and whatever this nonsense is,I tried to find out but in any case I’m too old-fashioned. I couldn’t see any value in it. And, I don’t know what the so-called ‘young generation’ of today really wants. What is it?” Ecclestone was then asked to further comment on if he felt attempting to attract a younger audience to F1 had any value Ecclestone went on to say “If you have a brand that you want to put in front of a few hundred million people, I can do that easily for you on television.Now, you’re telling me I need to find a channel to get this 15-year-old to watch Formula 1 because somebody wants to put out a new brand in front of them? They are not going to be interested in the slightest bit.Young kids will see the Rolex brand, but are they going to go and buy one? They can’t afford it. Or our other sponsor, UBS — these kids don’t care about banking. They haven’t got enough money to put in the bloody banks anyway.”

From here Ecclestone elaborated on the same point “That’s what I think. I don’t know why people want to get to the so-called ‘young generation’. Why do they want to do that? Is it to sell them something? Most of these kids haven’t got any money.I’d rather get to the 70-year-old guy who’s got plenty of cash. So, there’s no point trying to reach these kids because they won’t buy any of the products here and if marketers are aiming at this audience, then maybe they should advertise with Disney.” These comments seems a pretty clear indicator Ecclestone is very much someone who is thinking about the current time, and not planning for the future of F1, especially once he has gone. This shows that when Ecclestone does leave F1 it will be a much poorer state, although whilst a majority of this will stem from his influence and the incredible he has had on the sport he loves, it will also come from a lack of a succession plan that he would put in place.

In summary, for whilst Ecclestone has been without doubt the most influential man ever to Formula One as he evolved the sport from a niche one dominated by hardcore enthusiasts, to a sport recognisable worldwide with a huge queue of moving billboards racing round the circuit in far flung places of the globe. It does increasingly so recently that since Ecclestone effectively became an employee to F1’s owners CVC Capital, albeit a high ranking employee, his influence on F1 and therefore his relevance to modern F1 has diminished considerably. Although this article is not calling for Ecclestone to resign, I am simply stating it might well be time for Ecclestone to consider relinquishing some of his power in F1 in favor of a different direction, that is all.

A beginner’s guide to photography

Photography is something that always look simple enough from the outside, yet to be a competent photographer is something that takes a confident understanding of photographic terms and practices.

The first step to becoming a better photographer is understanding the primary functions of a still camera. Firstly for switching on a still camera most will be very easy to turn on. Simply press any one of the buttons on the back of the camera and this should you to the main menu of the camera.

From here the first things to help you take a great photograph are setting the shutter speed and aperture correctly. The shutter speed is the amount of time that the shutter is left open when taking a photograph. The second key aspect to a good photo is the aperture setting, which coincides with the shutter speed to create your desired photo. I will fully explain how to use both later on in this post.

Some other important features on a still camera are the Auto/Manual focus button. This is important as for beginners it is probably easiest to keep the camera set on auto focus, which means the camera will automatically set the focus to suit the light conditions. Once you get more confident with a camera you will be able to manually focus the camera to perfectly suit the conditions. Below is a full image showing you what most digital still camera layout’s are like.

_RX100_DSC1297b copy

Within the still camera category there are three types, point and shoot, DSLR and 35mm film. All of these have differing uses with firstly the point and shoot being the most simplistic of the three types. It’s primary use is to be easy to use for example for holiday photos. The point and shoot cameras are perfect for people starting out with photography as they have very basic functions yet can still produce a crisp, high quality photo.

The next standard of camera is the DSLR style cameras, which were initially only available to professionals, however recent developments have now meant they have reached the consumer market. These cameras are ideally suited for amateur photographers as the multitude of functions they have can result in a highly professional looking photo if used correctly. The aperture, focus,ISO and shutter speed settings can be adjusted to match certain light conditions for example. These camera settings can help the photographer produce a certain effect if they desire such as a blurred effect or a certain lighting angle.

Finally 35mm are the rarest of the three camera types, mostly because these are older style cameras which have generally been surpassed by modern technology. On the other hand, the 35mm camera were the leading technology at the time, and is still sometimes used as some photographers prefer the shots taken from an older style, less technological camera. Another plus point for 35mm camera are the fact the photographer can manually set the film speed, which can be changed to affect the style and quality of the shot. Generally, whilst 35mm camera have been left behind by modern DSLR and point and shoot cameras, although a keen amateur or professional photographer with good knowledge of 35mm cameras could still produce a high quality photo.

Much like the differing type of cameras, there are several different types of lenses which can be used for differing effects. There are two main types of lenses however, with the first main type being zoom camera lenses. These type of lenses can be adjusted to focus in or out on a particular subject, which makes it a lot easier to take a high quality photo on your chosen subject. Typically zoom lenses are used mostly in small format cameras, and this is simply because of their size and price limit that restricts their use beyond smaller cameras.

The second main type of lens is the “close up” or macro lens. This type of lens is typically used to photograph small subjects in a close up form. The biggest limiting factor however with macro lenses is the fact the depth of field is very narrow, something which is to counter-act means the lens is stopped down to give a greater depth of field. Despite this the macro lens is still a less favorable style of lens to use because of the lower quality of the depth of field in comparison to zoom camera lenses. Both zoom and macro lenses are the most common type of camera lens, there are plenty of other lesser known types which each serve for specific functions, although these types are rarely used for any other purpose.

The time that the shutter is left open is reflected in the shutter speed numbers on the screen. Shutter speed is easy to identify as it is presented as a fraction e.g. 1/125. The higher the numbers such as 1/125 will mean a much crisper and clearer shot compared to a lower shutter speed, such as 1/25, which will produce a more blurry shot.

This illustrates how the shutter speed can affect the photo, with this shot taking using a very low shutter speed of 1/30, which has produced this very blurry shot of Rafael Nadal.

The aperture is typically known as the F-stop, with the aperture setting being presented as F followed by a number e.g. F8. The aperture is the amount of light in by the lens therefore in poor light conditions the aperture will be at a high setting e.g. F16, whereas in very bright light conditions the aperture will be set very low e.g. F1.6.

The final aspect to learn as a key function of modern cameras is the film speed, which is the cameras sensitivity to light and is displayed as the ISO setting. This is particularly important when taking photos outside as the wrong ISO settings will mean the photos you take will be of a low quality because of the outside light. Therefore on modern DSLR cameras the ISO settings can be adjusted to suit the light conditions and the overall quality of the photo, with a higher number meaning a higher quality image but in a situation with a lot of light and would not be very good in outside sunny conditions or in rooms with high quality lighting. On the other hand, a very low number will produce a lower quality photo in terms of pixels but will be very good in high light conditions.

Light sources can be used to create a lighting effect within the particular shot, with an example being a slow shutter speed being used to create a blurry effect with the lights. Also studio lighting can be used to suit the subject of the photo, a practice which is commonly used in interviews or photo shoots. Also in outside lighting conditions the natural light can be used to create a desired effect with your photos.

One of the key first steps in learning about taking high quality images is learning the rule of three in photography. This is where you will learn to look at the image viewfinder in a grid format. This therefore means when looking to take a photo your subject is lined up perfectly through the viewfinder in a rule of three symmetry. This is the desired photo effect as it will produce a high quality image. Once you’ve learnt it the viewfinder will become a grid split into 9 squares, of which the desired effect is to have your subject of the photo perfectly framed within the central squares of the viewfinder.Another image composition effect is the golden triangle, which is typically used in photos with diagonal lines. This is composed of the photo being split into three main triangles of equal length which then make up the photo.

When it comes to editing photography, there are plenty of software and websites which can help photographers edit their photos. Some of the most popular editing software is Adobe photoshop and illustrator, both of which are widely used within the industry by professionals and budding amateur photographers alike.

One of the most common photo editing forms is cropping, where you will reduce the outside edges of the photo, and the effect of this is to improve the overall framing of the photo and can vastly improve the quality of the image to focus on a certain subject within the photo. Other popular photo editing techniques are dodging and burning, which decreases and increases the exposure of the photo to make it lighter and darker respectively. This technique is typically used when the photographer is forced to shoot in poor lighting conditions e.g sunlight or darkness, and whilst it cannot rectify extreme examples of either bright or poor lighting, it can help in some cases to improve the quality of the photo.

Here is an example of a cropped photo, where the photographer has cropped the outer edges of the photo to focus on the main subject, which is the flower.

The final major photo editing technique is adjusting curves, however this effect is difficult to master and is generally only used by competent amateur and professional photographers. Adjusting the curves is a term for adjusting the tones of a photo. This can have a big effect on the photo, as it can brighten or darken the photo, add contrast and help shift the colours used. Whilst using adjusting curves as an editing tool can seriously alter your photographs, it’s complicated technique means that a degree of competence with the system is needed before being able to use it effectively on your photos.

Roger Orgee dominates end of season Formula Ford Carnival

Next up on track for the penultimate race of the Championship Finals Raceday was the Castle Combe Formula Ford Carnival, a regular end of season one-off race for victory which has been going since 1996. This year’s entry was abit smaller than previous years although most of the championship regulars wheeled out their cars for one final race in the season. Nathan Ward was once again on pole in his Spectrum with the talented returnee Luke Cooper alongside him in his older Swift SC92 model. Michael Moyers was 3rd with Roger Orgee completing row 2.

At the start it was the two Higgins brothers who made the best getaway’s as Richard rose quickly from 6th on the grid whilst recently crowned Combe Formula Ford champ Adam shot from 8th, after he only completed 1 qualifying lap for this to save his car for the earlier final round of the Formula Ford championship. Nathan Ward managed to retain the lead however, until lap 2 when a determined Roger Orgee passed him on the inside going into Tower.

From here it seemed both Orgee and Ward had the edge on the others for pace as they opened a small gap back to Combe debutant Michael Moyers in 3rd by lap 3. Later on in this shortened 12 lap affair Orgee showed he was aiming to avenge his earlier title loss as he opened a lead of just over a second, whilst behind him Ward was now fighting Moyers, Adam Higgins and Luke Cooper for 2nd place. Unfortunately this battle was split apart on the next lap as contact between Moyers and Higgins at the Esses delayed the rest, and left Moyers with sidepod damage that was enough to force him into retirement at the end of the lap.

Now Nathan Ward was free of those behind him he once again set about challenging Orgee for the lead in the last few laps, although it seemed he was unlikely to find a way through. Behind them, a great battle for 3rd was now developing between Adam Higgins, Luke Cooper, Jonathan Hoad, Ed Moore and Richard Higgins. The final few laps were set to be frantic and unfortunately things once again ended in tears, as Richard Higgins was dumped off the track after a last lap collision.

Back at the front and Roger Orgee salvaged a Carnival win from his earlier title loss whilst Nathan Ward came home a close 2nd. Completing the podium was 2013 and 2014 Castle Combe Formula Ford champion Adam Higgins. Luke Cooper was 4th in his return to the circuit, with Jonathan Hoad bringing home his iconic Duckhams Van Diemen RF90 racer 5th whilst ex-champion and serial winner Ed Moore completed the top 6.

Whilst this year’s Carnival failed to live up to the glory days of the race in the mid-2000’s this year’s race was yet again a classic with a great battle between Orgee and Ward for the lead and even further down every podium place was hotly contested. The Carnival brought the curtain down on an amazing 2014 Castle Combe Formula Ford season, my only hope is that the action and level of entries can be sustained into 2015, with maybe even a few more faces to challenge at the front although that may simply be wishful thinking.

For any further information on the series please visit their website below.
http://www.ccracingclub.co.uk/championships/formula-ford-1600/

Monoposto’s Castle Combe 4th October 2014 report

The final meeting of the 2014 Castle Combe season began unfortunately with overcast skies and a damp circuit as the grid for the opening Monoposto race formed up. After a wet qualifying session it was the Formula Vauxhall Lotus car of Robin Dawe who claimed pole from Oliver Serell in his his Van Diemen RF01. As the opening 15 minute race started it was pole man Dawe who made the best start to grab and early lead, whilst 4th man Chris Lord shot up into a brief 2nd after a remarkable start, although he soon fell back from the leader.

Robin Dawe was clearly looking to make hay whilst the sun didn’t shine as he opened a 1.7 second opening lap lead from the pack, which was being led by third on the grid man Jason Timms in his impressive Speads RM07, who had moved up quickly past fast starter Chris Lord on the opening lap. Whilst leader Dawe was initially able to build his lead by lap 5 Jason Timms in 2nd began to close on him for the lead as the conditions improved. Whilst the threat of rain dissipating the track was improving as the race wore on, with the biggest benefactor being Terry Clark, who rose from 7th on the grid in his Van Diemen RF99 to pass Chris Lord for 4th at Folly on lap 6. He then quickly set upon Oliver Serell for 3rd at Tower on the same lap, before rapidly closing on Timms in 2nd.

Lap 7 saw Clark quickly dispose of Timms for 2nd, with Timms now appearing to suffer as he was passed on the same lap for 3rd by Serell at Camp. Just as it appeared Terry Clark would be challenging Robin Dawe for the lead he threw away his good work with a high speed spin exiting Quarry corner on lap 8. He re-joined 5th with plenty of work to do in the closing minutes of the race.

Clark quickly rose to 4th and was challenging Timms for 3rd at the Esses on lap 10 when he mysteriously went off to the inside of the track, although sadly this time he was unable to continue. With the seconds ticking down Robin Dawe was able to just about hold on for victory from Oliver Serell, who in turn only just held off the last lap charge from Keith Linforth in his Dallara F399. He remarkably rose from 18th on the grid to claim the final podium spot. 4th went to Chris Lord with the top 6 being rounded out by Jason Timms and Malcolm Scott respectively in a great opening race of two for the Monoposto series and their end of year Tiedman trophy.

A lot later on in the Castle Combe Championship finals race day the Monoposto crowd took to the track again for their second race and the eighth of the day. The grid was based on the drivers second fastest times from the morning’s qualifying session, which left race 1 winner Robin Dawe claim another pole with Jason Timms alongside him on the front row. Oliver Serell and Chris Lord completed row 2. This race was cut from 15 to 12 minutes because of lengthy stoppage in the earlier Castle Combe Saloons race.

The conditions were completely different to race 1 as the circuit was now bone dry, although that didn’t stop the same outcome as race at the start as pole man Dawe made the best getaway to lead early on. Later on in the lap however he was soon under pressure from Oliver Serell who had quickly made his way up to 2nd and was not challenging for the lead. An exciting battle developed in the early laps for the lead between Robin Dawe, Oliver Serell and Geoff Fern, who had made an excellent start and rocketed up from 8th on the grid to 3rd in the opening laps.

Lap 3 saw Fern continue his rise as he disposed of Serell for 2nd, however Serell soon re-took the place a lap later. The pace slowed on lap 5 as the Safety Car came out so the marshals could retrieve a stranded car at Old Paddock, although confusion reigned as the Safety Car missed the first 3 and instead picked up 4th man Malcolm Scott first instead. With time running out confusion reigned for several laps before the whole pack were sent round again so the Safety Car could pick up the top 3, with the rest then following behind.

With a final lap dash ahead the Safety Car peeled in on lap 8, with the first 3 immediately carrying on their battle for the lead. Despite numerous looks and half moves the order remained unchanged to the flag as Robin Dawe claimed his second win of the day, with Oliver Serell coming home a close 2nd with Geoff Fern not much further back in 3rd. A amusing anecdote from the finish was the fact both Dawe and Serell both missed the chequered flag and continued for a lap before Serell spun at Bobbies, therefore ending their battle after the flag. Malcolm Scott came home 4th from Ray Rowan in 5th and Lee Cunningham completing the top 6 respectively.

Both Monoposto races proved to be exciting affairs with plenty to keep the spectators entertained. I would personally like to see the series back again at Castle Combe next year, and I can only hope the competitors enjoyed the racing as much as the spectators did. For more information on this inexpensive and fun series please visit their website below.

Homepages – ARIES

Will there be a European NFL franchise anytime soon?

After experiencing the first of the three NFL international series games at Wembley stadium last Sunday between the Miami Dolphins and the Oakland Raiders, in the aftermath I found myself wondering as a fan, will there be a fully fledged international franchise in the NFL anytime soon?

The idea for the first NFL franchise to come from outside the United States of America has been slowly building momentum since the first international series game at Wembley in 2007. That one game has now turned into three regular season games with the promise of more to come in the ensuing years. This growing momentum could well lead to a permanent NFL franchise in the next 10 years, but could it work logistically?

Many at first glance would simply dismiss this idea with a quick “no”, citing the vast distance that would be between every other NFL franchise in America and a European franchise. The move would also meet with a widespread resistance from within the NFL, as I’m sure a large majority of the current 32 NFL franchises would not be willing to travel across to Europe to play, despite the obvious commercial benefits of the NFL branching out into Europe.

When actually giving this idea some thought some other considerations have to come into play also. Firstly history, whilst this may sound a bit strange to hear at first we must first look at the success and ultimate failure of NFL Europe when discussing a permanent franchise in Europe. Whilst NFL Europe contained some good players during it’s tenure from 1991 and 2007. The league was supported by the NFL with the teams using the European teams as a development league for young players not yet ready for the NFL. Alongside these players were those in the later stages of their career or free agents not picked up by the NFL after college. The attendances were steady if not spectacular with an average of just over 20 000 across the league for their final season in 2007. Whilst the attendance of 83 459 for last Sunday’s game is very impressive and shows the support the NFL has in Europe, yet could this be realistically sustained across a 16 week season?

Another factor to consider is the logistics with starting an NFL franchise. This is something that is difficult enough to start in America, let alone Europe with the last NFL franchise being the Houston Texans in 2002. The infrastructure needed to start the franchise would take several years to put in place, with obvious factors such as training facilities alongside finding a permanent stadium would all be things to organise. Aside from the infrastructure the actual roster itself would pose problems as it would likely be much harder to attract top line players to join a team so removed from their own culture, despite the growing international flavour of the NFL.

With all these factors considered for me the most logical step is to carry on with what the NFL is planning at the moment, to slowly increase the level of support in Europe with a gradual increase in the amount of games hosted in Europe to effectively gain the required support needed before any thoughts of a permanent franchise can be considered. For now the NFL has the right recipe for success with a crucial market such as Europe, it’s now up to them to follow through with it.

The Future’s bright for Indycar racing

From the moment the Indycar series and the Champ Car World Series decided to merge again in 2008, after 12 years apart, the Indycar series has been on an upward trend. After over a decade of American open wheel racing being in the doldrums the series now finds itself in very rude health after a fascinating 2014 Verizon Indycar season. What has been the key to the series recent revival?

The first major point for the upturn in the Indycar series is the merger itself. Back in the day, before the hideous split in 1996, the series was arguably a rival for Formula One with a bevy of professional teams and drivers from across the world, including many with experience of F1. Whilst the series had yet to reach it’s peak of the mid-1990’s the combining of the two series has led to an upturn in grid sizes and the quality of those involved in Indycar.


The starting grid sets off earlier this year

For example from the 2007 Indycar there were less than 20 full season entries, and in Champ Car things weren’t much better with Champ Car having 18 full season entries. Now fast forward to the present moment and the Indycar grid has risen slightly from two grids of 18 to a regular full season grid of 23 cars this year.

A second factor behind the revival has been the introduction of a new Dallara DW12 car for the 2012 season. After extensive testing by Dallara in 2011 with the help of the late great Dan Wheldon, the series final introduced a new car to the series for 2012 for the first time in 9 years. The buzz around the impressive new Dallara DW12 car gave the series added impetus and momentum, something that was badly needed and subsequently further enhanced with the announcement of new engine packages for 2012 also.


The Dallara DW12 during it’s development period during the latter half of 2011.

Both Chevrolet and Lotus announced they were joining the series in 2012, and although Lotus quietly quit the series after a disappointing 2012 season, Chevrolet have proved stern competition for the previous Honda dominance. With talk of new aero kits being developed for next year the battle between these two manufactures is expected to heat up further.

A third factor in the development of the Indycar series has been the upturn in driver talent on the grid. Whilst in the initial years of the series merging the driver line-up remained similar to the last years of both series, in the last few years this has changed dramatically. The 2012 season brought a new car and two faces more familiar to F1 fans than American Open wheel fans. The series generated some news headlines when it was announced F1 refugee Rubens Barrichello was join the series in 2012. Although he only raced 1 season in Indycar racing, Barrichello and Jean Alesi, ex-F1 veteran who raced in the Indy 500 that year, set the ball rolling with the F1 connection returning to Indycar.

After being left out in the cold by F1 the talented Paul Di Resta was linked with the vacant Chip Ganassi seat after cousin Dario Franchitti was forced to retire at the end of the 2013 season. Alongside this was a much improved grid in 2014 which contained ex-F1 Wildman Juan Pablo Montoya, who left Nascar to join Penske for the 2014 Indycar season. Alongside him were 5 ex-F1 drivers including Takuma Sato and Justin Wilson for this season. On top of the strong regular season grid, the grid for the centrepiece Indy 500 contained 1995 Indianapolis 500 winner and 1997 F1 World Champion Jacques Villeneuve alongside the highly popular controversial Nascar racer Kurt Busch.

Alongside the high profile faces the Indycar grid is being supplemented with an increasingly strong level of young European racers trying their hand at American open wheel racing. Alongside established runners such as the hugely impressive Simon Pagenaud, Sebastien Bourdais and Mike Conway there has been a recent influx of young talented drivers turning their backs on the European racing scene to pursue a career in Indycar.

Drivers such as Mikhail Aleshin, Luca Filippi and Jack Hawksworth have recently made the jump and their being joined by the likes of one time Marussia F1 driver Luiz Razia and 2012 British F3 champion Jack Harvey who both competed in the feeder Indy Lights series this year. A lot of talented European drivers facing budget problems are attracted to the Mazda Road to Indy feeder scheme, whereby the champions from the U.S Formula 2000, Pro Mazda and Indy Lights series gain funding and numerous tests to help them progress to the next rung on the ladder. A perfect example of it’s success is Sage Karam, who was the 2010 US Formula 2000 series champion and progressed to take the 2013 Indy Lights crown, guaranteeing him a 2014 Indy 500 drive at least.

http://www.sagekaram.com/files/2014/04/Sage-Actio-May-11.jpg?0d0003
Sage Karam in action during practice for this year’s Indy 500

Alongside the European influx there has been an increase in the amount of North American drivers getting their chance in the series, with drivers such as Marco Andretti, James Hinchcliffe, Ryan Hunter-Reay and Graham Rahal becoming household names in the series over the last few years. Over the next few years many more young North American and European drivers will be making the jump to the Indy Lights series, with a new car and a much more expansive involvement from Indycar teams sure to attract many young hopefuls to the series.


New 2015 Dallara IL15 Indy Lights car going through testing in the hands of series graduate Tristan Vautier

With rumours of a more international calendar with races in Europe and the Middle East for next year, alongside possible new individual aero kits from some of the teams next season is already shaping up to be a classic Indycar season, whereby champions Penske, Will Power and Chevrolet will be aiming to defend their crown from the challenge coming from Chip Ganassi racing, Andretti Autosport and Honda. Further enhancing the series will be a number of talented new European and North American racers looking to push their way onto the Indycar grid, supplemented by a revived and much more relevant Indy Lights series for international young hotshoes to announce themselves to the Indycar paddock. I for one cannot wait for the new season already.

For more information on the Indycar series or Mazda Road to Indy scheme please visit their official websites below
http://www.indycar.com/
http://www.indylights.com/
http://www.promazdachampionship.com/
http://www.usf2000.com/
http://www.indycar.com/RoadToIndy

Photo credits go to –
Indycar starting grid photo – sourced from http://www.richardsf1.com credit goes to http://www.Motorsport.com

Dallara DW12 Testing photo – sourced from http://www.queers4gears.com credit goes to unknown

Sage Karam photo – sourced and credit goes to http://www.SageKaram.com

Dallara IL15 Testing photo – sourced from http://www.Autosport.com credit goes to unknown

Max Verstappen appointment seismic shift for F1

Hot on the heels of his appointment to the Red Bull young driver programme, the motorsport world was thrown into shock yesterday as Red Bull announced that Max Verstappen would race for the Scuderia Toro Rosso team in F1 next year. Whilst for the wider world this will not at all be shocking that another young driver gets his shot on the F1 grid, his age and experience is what’s proved shocking for motorsport aficionados .

When Max Verstappen lines up on the grid for the Australian Grand Prix next year, he will have already set a record as the youngest driver ever to compete in F1. At 17 years old he will have a lot to learn over the winter as incredibly his second ever season of car racing will be on the F1 grid. Whilst their has been an increasing shift to promote talent at younger age’s with the previous youngest F1 racer, Jaime Alguersuari, is a prime example alongside Sebastien Vettel, who will retain his record of being the youngest driver to drive on an F1 weekend. Indeed, even further back in the mid-1990’s Max’s father Jos Verstappen received the same attention when he was promoted to the Benetton F1 team after only two seasons of car racing back in 1994.


Max’s father Jos driving for Benetton at the Italian Grand Prix in 1994, his debut season in F1.

For Max, the cautionary tales of his father Jos and Jaime Alguersuari will highlight what a difficult situation he has been thrust into. For his father Jos, his F1 career never seemed to recover from a difficult debut F1 season in 1994 with Benetton, although he was in and out of F1 drives up until 2003. Alongside that is a more recent example of Alguersuari, who was promoted to Toro Rosso at the Hungarian GP in 2009, aged only 19, only to struggle in his first two seasons before being unceremoniously dumped at the end of his best ever F1 season in 2011. Whilst he is still young and will compete in Formula E this year is appears increasingly unlikely he will drive in F1 again after only two and a half seasons in the sport and 31 points to his F1 name.

Whilst I am have explained so far the negative aspects of his step up to F1 next year, for many who have watched him so far this year in the FIA European F3 Championship, have no doubts he will produce results in F1. His debut season of car racing this year has been nothing short of sensational so far, as he currently sits 2nd in a highly competitive European F3 Championship, after taking 8 wins and 13 overall podiums from the season’s 27 races so far. It’s not just the results also which have been impressive with many people close to the series raving about his flamboyant driving style, with some even predicting he can be a future multiple World Champion.

It appears the offer of a race drive with Toro Rosso is what convinced Verstappen to sign with Red Bull as he also held a serious offer from Mercedes, who would have likely preferred him to move up the junior ladder before giving him an F1 berth, and it seems at this very early stage that Red Bull might just have stolen a future World Champion, much like they did to BMW when the snagged Sebastien Vettel from under their noses back in 2007.

Whilst the announcement of Verstappen has gained much press attention last night and today the biggest loser of this announcement has to be Jean Eric Vergne, who after 3 good seasons so far is being moved aside for Verstappen. This is desperately bad news as Vergne definitely deserves to remain in F1 next year, although he will have to find a seat outside the Red Bull nucleus for the first time since his first years of car racing. Furthermore, another two drivers who will lose out massively from this are Red Bull junior drivers Antonio Felix Da Costa and Carlos Sainz Jr.


Verstappen in action in FIA European F3 earlier this year
Felix Da Costa was passed over for a Toro Rosso drive last year for the talented Daniil Kvyat, a move which received similar scepticism yet has paid off for Red Bull this year, will surely be wondering if his chance has passed as he appears set to stay with BMW in the German DTM Touring Car Championship in 2015. Da Costa’s situation last year is mirrored this year by Sainz Jr, who is currently leading the prestigious Formula Renault 3.5 Championship yet has been passed over for a Toro Rosso drive for Verstappen, with his own chances of reaching F1 next year taking a hammer blow last night.

Max Verstappen seems likely to be a revelation at Toro Rosso next year, although for Jean Eric Vergne I hope he can remain in F1 next year as he has clearly shown so far he’s deserving of a place on the grid next year. For the likes of Da Costa and Sainz Jr I also hope to see them in F1 next year although their chances of reaching the top have taken a hit as Verstappen has jumped them in the Red Bull junior conveyor belt of talent, a bitter aftertaste from a scheme that has promoted so many to F1 is that some get left behind also. I will certainly be eagerly keeping track of Verstappen’s progress in he debut season next year for Toro Rosso.

Photos sourced from http://www.petervanegmond.nl , http://www.thecheckeredflag.co.uk and http://www.racexpress.nl

Photo credit goes to Peter Van Egmond, http://www.fiaf3europe.com and http://www.racexpress.nl